Comparison
A brain, not a filing cabinet.
Most AI memory tools are filing cabinets — they store past messages with a search box on top. Ricord is a brain: it understands what the facts are, how they connect, and what they mean together. Here's the side-by-side.
We extract facts
Every message your AI sees becomes entities, relationships, and tasks — not just text chunks.
We draw the graph
Every entity gets linked into a living knowledge graph. You can rotate it, zoom it, and search it — live 3D, right in your browser.
We write the wiki
Every person, project, and topic gets an auto-generated Wikipedia page about your world. No other memory tool ships this.
Head-to-head comparisons
Each dedicated page goes deeper — pricing breakdowns, strengths + weaknesses, migration paths, and an honest "when to choose them instead" section.
Ricord vs Mem0
$249/mo graph → $15/mo. Plus contradiction resolution.
Ricord vs Zep
OSS deprecation story + the "context engineering" rebrand.
Ricord vs Letta
Memory infra vs agent framework. Two shapes, often complementary.
Ricord vs Supermemory
Capture-first vs organization-first. Adjacent shapes.
Ricord vs ChatGPT Memory
Cross-AI continuity vs the walled garden.
Ricord vs Cognee
Hosted SaaS + MCP vs AGPL OSS + extraction-pipeline depth.
Ricord vs LangChain Memory
Production memory vs framework prototype primitives. Migration in 30 lines.
Ricord vs Graphiti
Finished memory product vs Zep's OSS bi-temporal graph library.
Ricord vs MemoBase
General-purpose agent knowledge layer vs profile-as-memory for B2C companion apps.
Ricord vs OpenMemory
Hosted production memory for agent products vs Mem0's local-first OSS personal-recall tool.
Best AI Memory API (2026)
All six APIs reviewed, decision matrix, honest weaknesses.
Use-case roundups
Picked by where you spend the most time, not by which competitor you're benchmarking against. Each page evaluates six options on criteria specific to that workflow.
Best AI memory for Claude Code
CLAUDE.md baseline, MCP install, six options ranked.
Best AI memory for Claude Desktop
Projects memory vs MCP servers, six options ranked.
Best AI memory for Cursor
.cursorrules vs Composer history vs hosted layers.
Best AI memory for Windsurf
Cascade Memories vs .windsurfrules vs a cross-tool hosted layer.
Best AI memory for Cline
The Memory Bank, automated — vs manual markdown + .clinerules.
Best AI memory for Zed
Rules + thread history vs an MCP-native cross-tool layer.
Best AI memory for Codex CLI
No built-in convention — what to use instead.
Best AI memory for Gemini CLI
GEMINI.md by hand vs auto memory that recalls by meaning.
Best AI memory for custom agents
Per-user isolation, cost at 10k MAU, SDK ergonomics.
Best AI memory for the Vercel AI SDK
No built-in memory — two calls around generateText vs DIY.
Best memory for CrewAI
Built-in short/long/entity memory vs hosted alternatives. Drop-in Tool snippet for cross-crew memory.
Best memory for Pydantic AI
Type-safe deps-injection drop-in. Keeps Pydantic AI's validation story intact.
Best memory for AutoGen
v0.4 event-driven async FunctionTool drop-in. Shared memory across every agent in the GroupChat.
Best AI memory for LangGraph
Checkpointer vs Store vs hosted — the split that catches everyone.
Best AI memory for LlamaIndex
ChatMemoryBuffer vs vector memory vs hosted — plus the official SDK drop-in.
Feature comparison
Feature availability as of June 1, 2026, verified against each vendor's public documentation and API.
| Feature | Ricord | Mem0 | Zep | Letta | Supermemory |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Knowledge graph | Every paid tier | $249/mo+ | |||
| Visual graph UI (entity map) | Live 3D | ||||
| Auto-generated wiki pages per entity | |||||
| Conflict resolution at ingest | Basic | ||||
| Temporal queries (since/before/asOf) | |||||
| Hard delete (GDPR) | |||||
| Auto-deprecation of stale facts | |||||
| MCP server (Claude Desktop / Code / Cursor / Codex) | 14 tools | Limited | Limited | ||
| Framework-agnostic REST API | |||||
| TypeScript SDK | |||||
| Per-client install guides | 8 clients | ||||
| User profile aggregation | |||||
| Hybrid search (keyword + semantic + graph) | |||||
| Teams + sharing with PII firewall | |||||
| Graph included in paid tier | Yes ($12/mo annual) | No ($249/mo) | Yes ($99/mo) | Yes ($29/mo) | |
| Paid pricing | From $12/mo annual | From $99/mo | From $99/mo | Letta Cloud | From $29/mo |
Why developers switch to Ricord
A graph you can actually see
Zep and Supermemory have graph fields under the hood. Ricord renders a live 3D force graph you can rotate, zoom, and search — same view in the dashboard Graph tab, Wikis tab, and the public Atlas page — so you can watch your knowledge take shape in real time.
Auto-wikis, not raw notes
When Ricord sees enough facts about a person, project, or idea, it automatically writes a Wikipedia-style page about it. Your memory becomes readable. No other memory tool does this.
Facts that self-correct
When a user moves from New York to LA, most memory tools keep both facts. Ricord detects the contradiction, deprecates the old fact, and surfaces the update — automatically.
Framework-agnostic, not locked in
Letta's memory lives inside its proprietary agent framework. Ricord is one REST API and one MCP endpoint that works with Claude, Cursor, LangChain, CrewAI, or any agent you build.
Quality gates before storage
Most memory pipelines write everything the LLM produces — duplicates, system noise, partial extractions all land in storage and surface during retrieval. Ricord filters content at ingest, so the wiki stays signal, not noise.
Teams-ready from day one
Share facts, wiki pages, instructions, or whole knowledge spaces across a team with a content-type firewall, PII scanning, approval flow, and version history. No other memory tool ships this.
Try Ricord
REST API + MCP server for Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf, VS Code, claude.ai, and ChatGPT. Set up in 60 seconds. Pro from $15/mo annual.
Get API key