Best AI Memory for AutoGen (2026)
Microsoft AutoGen v0.4 ships rich multi-agent orchestration — group chats, code execution, event-driven runtime. It does not ship long-term memory. Six ways to add real cross-conversation, multi-tenant, conflict-resolving memory to an AutoGen build — evaluated honestly.
What AutoGen ships (and what it doesn't)
AutoGen v0.4 is a rewrite. It went from the conversational v0.2 API to an event-driven async runtime split across three packages (autogen-core, autogen-agentchat, autogen-ext). The orchestration story is strong: GroupChats, RoundRobinGroupChat, SelectorGroupChat, Swarm patterns, code-execution agents, all production-grade.
What it ships for memory:
BufferedChatCompletionContext— keeps the last N messages of the agent's context. Solves "don't overflow the context window" for long runs.HeadAndTailChatCompletionContext— keeps the first M and last N messages. Useful when the system message + initial setup matter.- Tool-result caching — function-call outputs get persisted within the run.
What it doesn't ship: cross-run memory, semantic recall, entity extraction, conflict resolution, GDPR delete, multi-tenant scoping, or a UI for what the team has learned. Those gaps are why people end up here.
The quick answer
If you want a hosted memory layer that drops into AutoGen as a Tool without breaking the v0.4 async story: Ricord. If you want OSS and have engineers: Mem0 OSSwrapped as a FunctionTool. If your agents are single-task and don't need cross-run memory: BufferedChatCompletionContext alone is fine. The matrix is below.
The decision matrix
Ten criteria, six options. AutoGen's built-in BufferedChatCompletionContextis included as the "do nothing" baseline so the cost of adding real memory is honest.
| Criterion | Ricord | DIY | Mem0 | Letta | Cognee | Buffered |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Works as an AutoGen Tool / FunctionTool | DIY | Wrap REST | Wrap REST | Built-in primitive | ||
| Persists across team.run() / agent.run() calls | DIY | Within run only | ||||
| Per-user / per-tenant scoping | DIY | DIY | ||||
| Shared memory across agents in a GroupChat | DIY | Manual sync | Single context | |||
| Semantic recall (vector or graph) | ||||||
| Entity extraction + conflict resolution | Manual | |||||
| Browsable wiki of what the team learned | ||||||
| Hard delete (GDPR) | DIY | DIY | Drop context | |||
| Cross-client (same memory from Claude Desktop / Cursor) | API only | |||||
| Cost (smallest tier with the listed features) | $15/mo annual | Eng time | $249/mo for graph | Self-host + LLM | $0 OSS / self-host | $0 (built in) |
Slot-by-slot — which fits your AutoGen build
If your team runs one task at a time and starts fresh
BufferedChatCompletionContext alone is enough. Your agents share context within the run; nothing outlives team.run(). Right call for evaluation harnesses, one-shot tasks, single-purpose agents.
If your team needs cross-run memory at all
Ricord as a FunctionTool on every agent that needs to remember. Pass user_id at tool-call time; the same memory is reachable by every agent in the GroupChat. Drop-in below.
If you want OSS and have Python engineers
Mem0 OSS wraps cleanly as an AutoGen FunctionTool. Permissive Apache license; production-grade pieces (conflict resolution, multi-tenant, hard delete) are your responsibility to wire up.
If you're building a custom agent runtime
Lettabundles runtime + memory. Most AutoGen builds won't switch runtimes for this — the event-driven v0.4 design is the framework's real value-add — but if Letta's memory-first stance fits your roadmap, the swap is real.
If extraction-pipeline depth is the goal
Cognee (AGPL-3) is the right pick if your team needs configurable extraction stages. Cognee details →
Ricord as an AutoGen FunctionTool — the drop-in
AutoGen v0.4 expects async tools. Define two async functions, register them as FunctionTools, attach to every AssistantAgent that should remember:
from autogen_agentchat.agents import AssistantAgent
from autogen_agentchat.teams import RoundRobinGroupChat
from autogen_agentchat.conditions import TextMentionTermination
from autogen_ext.models.openai import OpenAIChatCompletionClient
from autogen_core.tools import FunctionTool
import httpx, os
RICORD = "https://api.ricord.ai/v1"
HEADERS = {"Authorization": f"Bearer {os.environ['RICORD_API_KEY']}"}
# Stable per-run user_id — in production this is your auth-resolved tenant
USER_ID = "alex"
async def ricord_recall(query: str) -> str:
"""Recall what we know about a topic from persistent memory."""
async with httpx.AsyncClient() as client:
r = await client.get(
f"{RICORD}/memories/recall",
params={"user_id": USER_ID, "query": query, "k": 5},
headers=HEADERS,
)
hits = r.json().get("hits", [])
return "\n".join(h["content"] for h in hits) or "No memory found."
async def ricord_save(content: str) -> str:
"""Save a fact for future recall across runs."""
async with httpx.AsyncClient() as client:
await client.post(
f"{RICORD}/memories",
json={"user_id": USER_ID, "content": content},
headers=HEADERS,
)
return "Saved."
# Wrap as FunctionTools
recall_tool = FunctionTool(ricord_recall, description="Recall facts from persistent memory.")
save_tool = FunctionTool(ricord_save, description="Save a fact for future recall.")
# Attach to agents — all agents in the team see the same memory
model = OpenAIChatCompletionClient(model="gpt-4o")
researcher = AssistantAgent(
name="researcher",
model_client=model,
tools=[recall_tool, save_tool],
system_message="Use ricord_recall before answering. Use ricord_save after learning anything new.",
)
critic = AssistantAgent(
name="critic",
model_client=model,
tools=[recall_tool],
system_message="Critique the researcher's answer using prior context from ricord_recall.",
)
team = RoundRobinGroupChat(
[researcher, critic],
termination_condition=TextMentionTermination("TERMINATE"),
)
# Run it — multiple agents, one shared memory
async def main():
result = await team.run(task="What deploy command should I use for the new project?")
print(result.messages[-1].content)Why Ricord wins for production AutoGen teams
- Shared memory across the GroupChat by default. Every agent that has the tools reads + writes the same memory. No syncing between agents, no namespace juggling. BufferedChatCompletionContext is per-agent; Ricord is per-team.
- Survives across
team.run()calls. AutoGen's built-in primitives reset between runs. Ricord persists what was learned, so the next run starts with prior context auto-fetched. - Conflict resolution at ingest. When the team contradicts itself across runs (it will), Ricord supersedes the older fact at write time. Recalls return the current truth.
- Per-user scoping is a parameter. Pass
user_idin your tool functions; the layer handles isolation. Multi-tenant by design. - Browsable wiki view. Your team can inspect what the AutoGen team has learned at
ricord.ai/dashboard— organized by entity, with backlinks and a 3D graph view. - Cross-client.The same memory the AutoGen backend writes is reachable from Claude Desktop, Cursor, Codex, Zed, Gemini CLI, Windsurf, and Cline via Ricord's MCP server — useful when the devs running AutoGen also debug from an IDE.
When to stick with the built-in
BufferedChatCompletionContext is the right call when:
- The team is single-task per run (eval harness, classifier, one-shot extractor)
- You don't need anything to survive past
team.run() - You don't need a UI for the team to inspect what was learned
- You're still validating the agent topology — adding memory layer is premature
The day any of those flips, attach the Ricord FunctionTools to your agents. AutoGen's tools boundary is the right seam.
Getting started
pip install autogen-agentchat autogen-ext httpx # Get an API key at https://ricord.ai/login?signup=true export RICORD_API_KEY=rc_live_... # Drop the FunctionTools above into your AutoGen agents